# Old House Restoration or Remuddling?

- Link: https://www.oldhouseguy.com/old-house-restoration-or-remuddling/
- Published: 2012-04-24T11:52:00-04:00
- Author: Ken Roginski

The newspapers said this is an old house restoration.

Obviously they have no idea what they were writing about.

This house received a Restoration Award by the Freehold NJ Historic Preservation
Commission.

[⌊historic house⌉⌊historic house⌉[

A board of supposedly “qualified” people issued this award.  Let’s look a bit further
and see what a mess was created.

**What is an old house restoration?**

A definition for restoration is:

 1. The return of something to a former owner, place, or condition.
 2. The process of repairing or renovating a building, work of art, etc., in order 
    to restore it to its original condition.

**What is remuddling?**

Remuddling is when the original character and integrity of a house is lost in the
renovation process.  Misguided improvements are made out of context and are insensitive
to the character of the house.

## See this beautiful 1890’s house.

[⌊Beautiful house before an old house restoration gone bad Tom and Patti Gaetano,
120 South St⌉⌊Beautiful house before an old house restoration gone bad Tom and Patti
Gaetano, 120 South St⌉[

A beautiful late Queen Anne house before it was remuddled.

They state that this is an old house restoration.  Sadly this house was remuddled
and this is how it appears today.

[⌊Old house restoration gone bad. Tom and Patti Gaetano, 120 South St Freehold⌉⌊
Old house restoration gone bad. Tom and Patti Gaetano, 120 South St Freehold⌉[

Old House Restoration gone bad. The integrity of this house has been vandalized 
by the owner who is an architect.

During the process everything historic such as millwork, doors, hardware, etc. were
removed and sadly discarded into a dumpster.  What a crime to the house and the 
environment!

[⌊old house restoration puts history in the dumpster Tom and Patti Gaetano, 120 
South St Freehold⌉⌊old house restoration puts history in the dumpster Tom and Patti
Gaetano, 120 South St Freehold⌉[

The homeowner put history in the dumpster and the Historic Preservation Commission
gave them an award.

Before this old house restoration the house was well kept and had great architectural
integrity. It is sad that the homeowner couldn’t leave the house alone.  It had 
survived over 100 years flaunting it’s historic character to passers by until now.

To the average person with the untrained eye, this new plastic siding is shinny 
and some will see it as an improvement.  Look at the before and after photos above
again and let me explain the changes that should have not been done.

Although the house cannot be considered ugly as it stands today, it no longer retains
its inherent good architectural design.  Part of the porch is enclosed and the house
is now covered with unhealthy plastic siding.

The facade of the house features three different styles of windows –  Six-over-six,
six-over-one, and four-over-one.  Two sets of windows are rectangular and one set
contains square window panes. The goal seemed to have been the mish-mash look of
a McMansion – not to mention the homeowner is an architect who you would think would
have some knowledge of what an old house restoration is!  The architect is evidently
more accustomed to McMansion design.

**Definition of a McMansion from Wikipedia:**

>  _…mix multiple architectural styles and elements…multiple roof lines, unnecessarily
> complicated massing…producing a displeasingly jumbled appearance. The builder 
> may have attempted to achieve expensive effects with cheap materials, skimped 
> on details,or hidden defects with cladding…Sold to “parvenu” – those having new
> money but lack the necessary refinement. The definition of parvenu on Wikipedia
> references Molly Brown survivor of the Titanic – who went from rags to riches 
> over night. (See the movie “[The Unsinkable Molly Brown”starring Debbie Reynolds ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vk10MoMpMIA))._

Obviously, this house was not designed nor meant to feature six-over-one or four-
over-one windows. One-over-one windows would undoubtedly work much better.  Scroll
up and notice the simple elegance of the windows on the original house.

Also notice that the trim is in a tan color which works well with the teal blue.
But why is the balustrade on the roof and the hand rail at the steps white and not
tan?   These elements should match.  Were they an after-thought?  Is this an example
of this owner/architects work?

[⌊old house restoration with bad replacement windows⌉⌊old house restoration with
bad replacement windows⌉[

This house should have matching windows. Now there are rectangular and square window
panes. This means that the wrong size windows were used.

[⌊old house restoration disaster with picture framed windows⌉⌊old house restoration
disaster with picture framed windows⌉[

The window could not be designed any worse. Never ever use a picture framed window.

Notice the windows are “picture framed”.  This is a window frame** WITHOUT a sill
at the bottom or a drip cap at the top**.

It therefore looks just like a picture frame with mitered joints at all four corners
which allow easy infiltration of water.  **(Water damage will not be noticed under
the vinyl until it gets bad enough to be see indoors.)**

There is no  to sill provide a base.  Your mind interprets the sill as a support
base. Now all you have the appearance of a hole in the siding of the house.

The sill would allow water to run off and away from the building.  A drip cap above
the window casing would also deflect water. That will not happen here for these 
important feature are missing.  **Never picture-frame a window!**

There is a lot to understand about good and bad window design and why this design
is important which cannot properly be explained here.  Click here to[ better understand window design ](https://www.oldhouseguy.com/window-designs/).

## **The Gable**

There are fish scale shingles in the gable.  When using a secondary siding material
such as fish scale shingles, there needs to be an architectural separation between
the two where the siding changes.  On the original house this would work well.  
By adding a belt course or band at the base of the gable, this area would then be
neatly separated from the lower portions of the house. Read more about [decorative shingles ](https://www.oldhouseguy.com/decorative-shingles/).

However on the remuddled house, the roof on the right side of the gable extends 
lower.  The band or belt course installed extends from the lower corner of the gable
on the left, to a random area on the right side not an opposite end of the roof.
The architecture is not there to visually connect or create a breaking point there
for a separation. **The fish scale shingles seem out of place and a sense of balance
is lost**.

[⌊old house restoration gone wrong with fish scale shingles⌉⌊old house restoration
gone wrong with fish scale shingles⌉[

If the roof did not slope down farther on the right, the horizontal band separating
the fish scale shingles from the square shingles below would look fine. This was
not done. Can you see and feel the disharmony?

It is really sad as to what was has been done to this house.  All traces of its 
historic integrity have been blatantly destroyed.   But the sage gets worse.

## Pork Chop Eaves.

The eaves of the house has been converted to Pork Chop eaves. This is a sure sign
that the designer had no understanding of architecture. Briefly, this is a cheap
way to convert a good design into a design commonly used on McMansions. Read all
about [roof eaves and the awful pork chop eaves ](https://www.oldhouseguy.com/roof-eaves/)
here.

## Old house restoration award is presented.

To top it all off, **the Preservation Commission presented the homeowners with a
RESTORATION AWARD** (go back to the top for definition of Restoration).  A Preservation
Commission is viewed as an authority on preserving the character of old homes and
although preservation cannot be enforced, it should be promoted and understood –
at least a little if you are a member.

**The homeowner was awarded for the desecration of history – not an old house restoration.
The HPC is not only setting a very poor example for others to follow, they are encouraging
other homeowners to do the same.**  One of the purposes for having a Preservation
Commission is to educate and set an example.  Awards were granted to two homes, 
the other awarded home was very much deserving.  Here is a [link to the news article – preservation awards ](https://www.oldhouseguy.com/assets/freehold-news.pdf).
It’s funny in a sad way.

The article really shows that the architect-homeowner, and the councilman Marc LeVine
on the Historic Preservation Commission have no clue about an old house restoration
or what they are talking about. It’s just political garbage.

The important thing to keep in mind is **just because your town has a Preservation
Commission does not mean that your dwindling historic resources are protected** (
actually I can write a book about this). A false sense of security provided by a
Preservation Commission is more dangerous than having none at all.  [Homeowners and commissions must understand that they are stewards for historic buildings. ](https://www.oldhouseguy.com/freehold-history/)

Also, **there is a[ big difference between an architect and a preservation architect ](https://www.oldhouseguy.com/modern-architects-and-historic-preservation/)**
as you can see in this example.  Many architects, although they may love old buildings,
should stay far away from them and leave them to a architect specialized in preservation.
This homeowner-architect is someone that should stay far away from vintage homes!

Vintage homes need someone that knows what they are doing. Would you take your 90
year old grandmother with a heart condition to a General Practitioner or a Heart
Specialist?
