Owning a house new or old is expensive.
Many homeowners see maintenance issues and know they should be addressed but frequently put it off.
The problem is that these maintenance issues quickly become large expensive repairs.
As a steward of an old house, this homeowner is being irresponsible and making a foolish financial decision.
Historic neighborhood.
This repair now becomes expensive and can harm the integrity of the building if not repaired correctly. If the repair becomes un-repairable it is then referred to as demolition by neglect.
If the home is in a historic district the homeowner would be required to repair or replace the damaged feature exactly as it was. There are times that a homeowner may appeal to the historic preservation commission that due to financial reasons they cannot afford the proper repair. In the case of a porch balustrade, the homeowner may hope a plastic one in a similar style would be acceptable.
Although a plea of financial hardship may be somewhat true, this is not fair to the house or the neighborhood and absolutely no consideration should be given.
Why should other homeowners properly maintain their houses and someone pleading financial hardship get off easy?
There are people that say they do not have the money for home repairs, but they do find the money for new cars and frequenting restaurants.
Don’t let this happen in your neighborhood because of laziness.
I doubt money is skimped on or house repairs are considered when the time comes to purchase a new television or plan a family. Don’t fall for a foolish plea of financial hardship.
Different people have different priorities. That may be well and good but their lack of responsibility to their home has a huge impact on the neighborhood and is unfair to the individual neighbor who is properly maintaining their historic home.
To those of you out there that are part of HPC review boards, I’m sure you have been through this many times. Remember you are responsible for the character of a historic neighborhood and will be held accountable to the other homeowners now and in the future.
Financial hardship is in the eyes of the beholder. A good historic commission should be aware of maintenance issues and notify, or if necessary, fine the homeowner before the issue becomes bigger.
Good Morning, I sit on the city council for the City of Victor, Colorado and am constantly advocating for historical restoration and preservation. Victor is a gold mining town 6 miles South of Cripple Creek is considered one of the best preserved mining towns in the state. But that is going down hill due to apathy, low property values that draw undesirables, too many rentals with absentee landlords, and out of state property owners. We have some preservation “guidelines” but nothing that is tied to the building permitting/code process.
I would like your permission to reprint some of your articles in our city newsletter to educate property owners of the value of preservation and correct restoration.
Your articles are intelligent, informative and great at setting straight the myths and misinformation regarding historic restoration and preservation.
Thanks,
Bruce
Hi Bruce – feel free to use any information you think will help you. Best of luck! Ken
We have the same mess going on in Montgomery, Al. I wish you the best of luck.
Your reasoning skills are abysmal.
Some historical districts are so egregiously difficult to deal with and require so many permits, approvals, inspections, etc., and have arbitrary conflicting rulings, that the cost of labor skyrockets. Several municipalities in Virginia are so notorious that many contractors refuse to work in the district; those that do must be specially licensed by the municipality. A roof repair that should cost ~$15,000 ends up being closer to $40,000. That’s with the same materials, specifications, etc. When the financial hardship is caused by the board itself, it is so absurdly illogical to blame the home owner.
Additionally, retirees that have lived their lives in a house, or they or their parents even built the house, get placed into these militant historic districts and are unable to afford the aforementioned, inflated costs
Beyond the specifics, semantically, all you did was equivocate. Financial hardship is most assuredly not in the eyes of the beholder — it is a legally defined term and is generally derived from low-income thresholds that are computed per region based on collected statistics.
While I agree that Mr. Roginski could have used a better argument, I think what you’re saying is utterly inappropriate and uncalled for. I think you’re missing his point entirely, and to make your argument worse, you fail to even acknowledge that some of us care passionately about what our historic homes look like, and are willing to make great sacrifices ourselves to maintain their irreplaceable character. I also humbly maintain that, If you don’t want to deal with living in a historic district, don’t continue to live in one. Historic and well-preserved houses are usually very expensive to buy and maintain – I’m sure you could find a much cheaper home in the suburbs that’s more to your liking!
Is it harsh to judge others for finances, especially if their home has been in their family for many years. Would it be kinder to help the homeowner than judge. This would benefit the neighbor hood and maintain the character that would be lost should the property be demolished.
Most definitely. Help paint or whatever you can do would be great. A can of paint can save thousands of dollars. Unfortunately many people have the money but spend it all on gambling or travel just as an example and neglect their house. No excuse for them!